Public sentiment towards Trump's tariff policy changes is overwhelmingly negative, with many Americans expressing frustration over rising consumer prices, economic disparities, and a perception that these tariffs disproportionately benefit the wealthy while harming everyday citizens. The comments highlight skepticism regarding the effectiveness of tariffs and a broader distrust in the administration's claims about their benefits.

Donald Trump

American consumers

Wealthy individuals

Businesses impacted by tariffs

buzznumbnuts

Biberundbaum

The problem with this map is that it's almost pointless for a lot of businesses because Trump changes his mind so often.

Nobody knows how much importing Canadian aluminum will cost four months from now.  Nobody knows if you placed a big order of parts from China today, what the price will be when it gets off the boat in a month.  Nobody knows how much Indian made iPhones will cost by this time next year.

How does anyone do even medium term business planning when shit changes so fast?  This map was posted less than an hour ago and it might already be out of date.  The uncertainty will do way more harm to trade than the tariffs will.

Brilliant_Trade_9162

I believe trump left out of the tariffs some of the main products of Brazil's exports, but I'm having trouble finding that information. I could be massively wrong tho.

GuerisUndertale

Damn that’s crazy 

Where are the Epstein files?

FeatureOk548

Speedrunning reversing decades of diplomatic work

Fantastic-Guest-6572

That's a whole lot of taxes on the American people.

Dank_Vader32

Nope, Mexico got "90 more days". Whatever that means.

Cafx2

What the hell did Kazakhstan do to deserve 25% out of literally all of its neighboring countries in the region (save for China)

No_Comfortable5365

So for Americans:


Everything costs more.


Nobody is going there so your tourism  sector is gone. 


You have no social floor. 


Jesus, land of the fear. 

_Druss_

Brazil getting punished for not allowing an election to be stolen by a dictator is insane (though not out of character considering it is Trump). 
Also Canada getting a higher rate than China is just stupid. And where is Russia’s punishment?

Distance_Efficient

Copernikaus

Tariff? You mean tax on American consumers.

OliverClothesov87

As a Canadian, IDGAF. All this is doing is pushing our politicians to do what they should have done years ago and diversify our trade.

If/when the americans get their shit straight the world will not look the same for them. You've shown your true colours and they are fucking ugly.

[deleted]

Need to be getting those tarrifs down to 5% on the UK Donald, don’t feel quite as special knowing Aus has got the same deal

EasternFly2210

50% on Brazil just because they had the guts we didn’t have to prosecute their old, corrupt president.

fffan9391

"The map of countries that made fun of Trump"

Connect_Progress7862

Scooterguy-

77 million Americans voted for this. They love Trump, no matter how stupid, how arrogant, how blatantly cruel he is.

Admirable-Horse-4681

Even-Space

TamedTheSummit

95% of Canada exports are protected under nafta

FishCreekRaccooon

Eggs were higher today at the store. Coffee is up due to the tariffs on Brazil and the Canadian tariffs make maple syrup more expensive. 

Pancake breakfasts are now a luxury.

rexeditrex

Crazy to think that Canada, the largest trade partner and arguably closest ally, is getting higher tariff rates rhan most countries

DreamlyXenophobic

That 35% tariff on Canada stands out as truly bizarre.

Next president should do a world apology tour. Preferably with Trump in a cage.

Vectoor

Dipshit actually thinks Lula will give in to his bullying and let Bolsonaro off the hook for sedition because of a tariff.

GlitteringBobcat999

"The tariffs are about trade deficit",  yet the country with the highest tariffs is one where the US has a huge trade surplus.  It is 100% being done as a favor to the Bolsonaro family who are his friends and supporters.

Joe_Peanut

Canada is a great power's dream neighbor: 

Has culture and history similar to yours. It isn't as strong (militarily) as you to pose a threat, but you don't even have to think about that, as the country in question s your ally and one of the most peaceful and democratic nations in the world. Additionally, it also is in geographically strategic position, has tons of natural resources and you have splendid trade relationship.

What do you, then? You make everything you can to piss it off, of course!

martian-teapot

A map of all the dudes who've banged Melania?

LTrain2024

KA440

reminder to any Americans reading this:

**you** are the one paying for this

BigHatPat

Yay, I love more expensive groceries and shit!

bloodrider1914

He always turns on the people closest to him, like historic allies Canada and Mexico.

UnTides

I feel sorry for the US people who will have to pay all these tariffs

ctk80

juguete_rabioso

The world is literally giving zero shits. Congrats on paying more in taxes, America - I guess

exbusinessperson

[But what about the penguins?](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly8xlj0485o)

str8dwn

Imagine if we all just stopped paying our bills and emptied our bank accounts and let them go into the negative all 350 million of us

lizardwizard-ncconel

tariffs on Canada affect only about 15% of exports to the usa.

and where's the unredacted epstein files, taco?

PortlandZoo

The 50% tariff on Brazil, announced by U.S. President Donald Trump and implemented via an executive order on July 30, 2025, effective August 6, 2025, is primarily a politically motivated action rather than an economic one. The key reasons cited for this tariff are:
1.  Retaliation for the Prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro: Trump has repeatedly linked the tariff to Brazil’s ongoing criminal trial against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a close political ally. Bolsonaro faces charges for allegedly attempting to stage a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Trump has called the trial a “witch hunt” and an “international disgrace,” demanding it be dropped, comparing it to his own legal challenges in the U.S. The tariff is seen as an attempt to pressure Brazil into halting these proceedings.
2.  Alleged Attacks on U.S. Digital Trade: Trump’s letter to Lula also cited Brazil’s “insidious attacks” on American companies, particularly referencing Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ orders to U.S. social media platforms to remove content deemed disinformation or hateful. These actions, which Trump labeled as “secret and unlawful censorship,” are seen as infringing on the free speech rights of Americans and U.S. companies operating in Brazil. A U.S. trade investigation into Brazil’s digital trade practices was also announced, escalating the dispute.
3.  Geopolitical Concerns Over BRICS and De-Dollarization: Beyond the stated reasons, the tariff is partly a response to Brazil’s role in the BRICS coalition (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), which has pushed for alternatives to the U.S. dollar in global trade. The BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro in July 2025, hosted by Brazil, heightened Trump’s concerns about the group’s efforts to reduce U.S. economic influence, prompting broader tariff threats against BRICS members. Brazil’s increasing trade alignment with China, including tripling rare earth exports in 2025, further irritated the U.S. administration.
4.  Incorrect Claims of Trade Imbalance: Trump’s letter falsely claimed the tariff was needed to address an “unfair trade relationship” and a U.S. trade deficit with Brazil. In reality, the U.S. had a $7.4 billion trade surplus with Brazil in 2024, with U.S. exports ($49.7 billion) exceeding imports ($42.3 billion). This discrepancy has been criticized as a pretext, with the tariff seen as a tool to exert political leverage rather than correct economic imbalances.
The tariff, while broad, excludes key Brazilian exports like commercial aircraft (e.g., Embraer jets), energy products, orange juice, and certain metals, reducing its economic impact to an effective rate of about 30.8%. However, it will still raise costs for U.S. consumers on goods like coffee (30% of U.S. imports from Brazil) and beef, potentially increasing retail coffee prices by 25 cents per cup. Brazil has vowed to retaliate with matching 50% tariffs on U.S. goods under its Economic Reciprocity Law, risking a trade war that could harm both economies. Critics, including Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, have called the tariff “grotesquely illegal” under international trade agreements, arguing it violates U.S. law and World Trade Organization rules by using tariffs to interfere in another country’s judicial system.
In summary, the 50% tariff is a multifaceted pressure tactic rooted in Trump’s personal allegiance to Bolsonaro, displeasure with Brazil’s digital regulations, and broader geopolitical frustrations, rather than a coherent economic strategy.

Competitive_Twist149

Missed out Switzerland's 39% tariff. 

Really scratching my head why the Swiss would want to buy US cheese, chocolate, and watches...

stateit

I love how Canada is getting tarrifed /s
For real though, time to open way more trade with Europe

WesternFirefighter53

What did Kazakhstan do to get those tariffs?

Never mind. Truth and/or logic doesn't really apply here.

MarkSSoniC

I'm working with a huge corporation right now that sells things at stores (I have to be vague) and they're gearing up for the big holiday push by cutting back on what they're selling by a LOT, specifically because of tariffs. 

If your margins are slim on specific products, it's not worth getting it to the shelves. 

This is beyond stupid.

Ambitious_Ad6334

It's wild that Canada has a higher tarrif than China..

EdwardLovagrend

Misleading map. The tariffs are actually all on Americans.

Abacus118

I guess South Africa, Libya, and Algeria specifically can go fuck themselves?

BainbridgeBorn

r/MapsWithoutNZ - new zealand also has 15%

lotuskiddo

Can someone give me the run down on Brazil's 50% tariff rate?

polysnip

This map is flat-out wrong. Just because you don’t like Trump’s tariffs doesn’t mean you should post blatantly false maps on r/mapporn…

Thailand, Cambodia, and Malaysia just got 19% yesterday. Afghanistan and a lot of countries in sub-Saharan Africa got 15%. Every country got 10% minimum… tons of errors on the map.

Harvestman-man

Tip of the hat to you Brazil, making numbers great again

Dapper_Ad_4027

Don't think I didn't notice that you let the tip of New Zealand appear on here. You should be ashamed of yourself.

corksoaker84

He really wants us to forget that he’s in the Epstein files

Curious_Problem1631

MrTickles22

A post for r/agedlikemilk.

Not sure, but I'm taking my chances at this point.

BookkeeperMaterial55

Everyone wants to tax the rich, but when it happens Everyone is mad

Playful-Insect5650

MMetalRain

Here is a map of the taxes Trump is imposing on the American People in the largest tax hike on the American people in the history of the “United” States

zkfc020

What I really don't get: How does Trump ensures, that exporting companies don't just move the goods to a country that has no US import tariff and import to US from there? Like China sells to Iceland sells to USA.

Active_Birthday8340

Not that I think anyone is going to see this, but this map makes me realize his tariffs are about politics--not economics.

pocketdrums

Safetosay333

Can’t believe coffee is going to cost 10 bucks a cup thanks to a pedophile

SergeantThreat

YaumeLepire

“The Land of the Free” strikes again.

juanito_f90

He really is trying to fuck it up for everyone, isn’t he?

tannerbo

Purplebuzz

Tariffs provide zero competitive edge when there’s no local production. US outsourced its manufacturing decades ago. Nobody is going to return it to the US, due to the tariffs as Trump delusionally thinks. Even if they do, it’s an immense investment and the results won’t be seen before 5–10 years. Many companies prefer ditching the US market altogether, rather than invest what Trump demands. 

His tariffs have much to do with punishing countries and leaders he dislikes. For example on Brazil he doubled them from 50 to 100% because the government won’t pardon the former president who was a Trump’s ally. He did the same with India. 

Now, do you think next POTUS (from any party) will not remove such insane tariffs? I think you’re very wrong.

Oberon_17

Congress has the power of the purse. I think certain justices on the Supreme Court would agree that Trump cannot unilaterally add Tariffs via Executive Order.

The next Democratic President will absolutely remove these new tariffs. Because they understand what a tariff is, and they know how it works. And they know that these tariffs cause suffering for most Americans.

Level-Ladder-4346

From the sounds of it the Supreme Court is going to save Trump from himself and remove the tariffs long before his successor shows up.

Roadshell

On Biden, yes, he reversed some tariff policy and kept others unrelated to tariffs in place like quotas but not merely because loss of revenue or competitive edge. For example on Japan and South Korea the US preserved punitive policy on steel and aluminum imports a durable goods also for purely political purposes. There was pressure from the steel belt during the election in PA, MI, and others to keep punitive policy abroad in place using emergency-based measures like some tariffs and separately quotas.

That doesn’t mean the revenue was validly collected. The courts have twice agreed wide tariff authority is illegal delegations of tax power from Congress under the guise of emergency periods. Try explaining that to a union voter in Wisconsin, but the point is that illegally raised revenue methods can be stopped and even refunded back. It’s happened before. 

There exists an even larger national voting bloc than swing state steelmakers that *does* care about these tariffs being based on legal methods and reasoning, like business owners and democratic state leaders arguing in place of republican congress. That is what the Supreme Court is weighing now and most justices appeared to be skeptical of these high, easy tariffs based on declared emergencies away from congressional review. The easy regulatory or tax revenue depending on how you argue it is over. This is why Trump claims catastrophe if emergency tariffs end, because he will need to stop and unwind that revenue he collected illegally. 

When a new president comes in, businesses and opposition parties will still exist, and hopefully Congress will step up oversight. All of them want to see this one stream of revenue cut, because they don’t trust each other to declare emergency tariffs after Trump’s second term. So the next president likely won’t be able to use wide emergency tariff powers like Trump and Biden had a free hand to employ for tariffs. Instead they will have time limited national security tariffs reviewable every few months by Congress and the courts, and old methods appealing to political groups like rust belt unions like trade quotas will remain. If you can’t raise revenue originally, you could never use it to pay down debt for fiscal policy anyway.

SECDUI

&gt;  In Bidens first term he reversed many things except the tariffs Trump did on China

Yes, because reversing the tariffs doesn't reverse the situation. if Biden unilaterally removes the US tariffs on products, there's no guarantee China removes their tariffs as a favour in return. This is why tariffs are generally removed as a result of free trade agreements, which are extremely complex and typically negotiated over several years. And Biden inherited a situation in which the US had just spent four years unilaterally tearing up its existing trade agreements, which is a terrible place to start those negotiations from.

I think you're right that the next Dem president won't reverse the tariffs, but that's because just unilaterally cutting the tariffs is potentially a terrible idea.

&gt; I dont see them taking it away because then you would have to figure out how to replace the 400 billion each year and or how to pay off the higher government financing costs.

They could just replace the tariff tax with a different tax, like an income tax rise. If done progressively that would ensure the majority of the burden of replacing that revenue would fall to the wealthy.

DaveChild

I believe by that time, we will see production of state-of-the-art, next-generation, fully automated 'lights out' factories here in the U.S. for domestic production. 

Basically... Giant 3D printers. Just feed it raw materials, upload schematics, and watch the product assembled and ready to ship. 

I can see us going into a "print on demand" economy for individual consumers. Especially if domestic manufacturers, through massive savings on labor and overseas costs. Can undercut foreign competitors such as Alibaba/Aliexpress, Temu, and Shein.

megacide84

Trump is already removing tariffs. Between that and the Supreme Court it’s a pretty low chance that there will be any tariffs to remove. 

The stock market might be stable but inflation is still going to be a problem. We always knew the worst impacts were going to be delayed and TACO Trump prolongs that longer. Simply put you’ve got a lot of businesses that aren’t going to survive this and prices which will continue to rise. 

The main reason that a future president might not get rid of them right away is to avoid shocks to the economy and to try and repair the global trade damage. But we know from history that broad tariffs are bad for the economy long term, I don’t think the next president is going to take that chance. The tax revenue from tariffs is not more than the long term damageto economic growth.

sawdeanz

Hi all,

A reminder that comments do need to be on-topic and engage with the article past the headline. Please make sure to read the article before commenting.  Very short comments will automatically be removed by automod. Please avoid making comments that do not focus on the economic content or whose primary thesis rests on personal anecdotes. 

As always our comment rules can be found [here](https://reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/fx9crj/rules_roundtable_redux_rule_vi_and_offtopic/)

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Economics) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

I don’t think that a successor would instantly remove them but I think what would actually happen is that a future President would negotiate free trade agreement country by country. The reason they will do that, is not because of reciprocal tariffs but because it's only a matter of time until countries start to heavily put taxes on US services. These will be the main factor a future President will try to get removed.

Facktat

Governments don’t buy stuff, people and businesses do. If Americans stop buying international goods because of cost, tariff tax revenue drops. Tariffs will dampen demand, and the US market will no longer be attractive. It’s a downward spiral that will be unstoppable in a few years.

JCPLee

A future president will have to actually get Congress to remove the tariff powers from the president and limit them to 90 days for actual emergencies. I get the idea that in some circumstances there needs to be swift immediate action on trade. But any tariffs imposed as an emergency approach should have a firm expiration date like 90 days. The idea that the president can just set tariffs on their whim is insane.

det8924

Any president that doesn’t immediately remove them is dumb. 

This has caused a global slowdown and will eventually lead to one hell of a recession/depression. 

Dudes about to learn the lesson of EVERY president that has tried doing blanket tariffs. A crippling depression

xViscount

It took years of complex negotiations to rid the world of tariffs in the 80s and mere weeks for one moron to take a wrecking ball to world trade.

feuwbar

I suppose we look at the example of President Biden, who retained some of Trump’s first term tariffs, but unwound other ones.

Should be noted that President Biden went in further on anti-China tariffs than Trump term 1 with the *targetted* EV tariffs, but simultaneously relieved steel tariffs on the EU. 

What this says to me is that tariffs are likely to stick around as a policy tool, though hopefully future administrations will understand the economic impacts of using them better than this current administration.

Young_Lochinvar

The tarrifs will stop real fast if the economy sours in any meaningful way. The path to electoral landslide is so easy for democrats if the economy sours and they can campaign on, “on day 1 we can instantly make everything in your life cheaper, by removing these tariff taxes on everything you buy.” -  people love the government handing them money, and there’s no easier political play than that strategy for 2026.

TunaHuntingLion

No, trump's tariffs won't survive next year's Congressional elections.  A new congress will move quickly to restore sanity to the economic chaos that now comes from the White House.  2/3rds of US voters are fed up with this on again, off again of announcing tariffs, postponing them and then cancelling them altogether.  Donald trump is a bully-in-chief, trying to run the US government the way he has bankrupted 4 casinos.

icnoevil

Trump’s tariffs are slowing economic growth, raising prices, undermining American manufacturing, marginalizing the US geopolitically, and attracting widespread public opposition.

But the article makes a stark prediction: That despite all the above, future US governments may want to keep them, and such policies may become the new normal for America and global trade. The reason is: **Tariffs are, by definition, taxes on imported goods, and these increased taxes are set to become a big, easy revenue source for the US government.**

- This year, the federal government collected more than $152 billion from tariffs(taxes by another name). And this revenue is projected to be $2.2 trillion over the coming decade. **After his “Big Beautiful Bill” giving Americans the largest tax cut in recent history, Trump has now imposed the largest *tax hike* in recent history, and he has accomplished this without a Congressional vote.** In fact, most people aren't even calling them taxes!

- If the Supreme Court ultimately allows these tariffs(which it will, because over half of its nominees are loyal to Trump), **tariffs will become an easy way for all future governments to impose tax rises, because they don’t need a Congressional vote, and they also don’t carry the usual stigma associated with taxes**(in fact they can be projected as a win for America since they’re “targeting” foreign goods). 

- It will be difficult for any future White House administration to overcome the temptation to take this route to easy money, particularly considering the projected impact of Trump’s income tax cuts and growing spending on Medicare and Social Security. It’s an economically unsound policy, but even if it eventually becomes unpopular among voters, it’ll still be difficult to dislodge.

- The root cause behind this is a fundamental tension at the heart of American fiscal policy: The US government’s need for revenue is rising, while Congress’s appetite for taxation is declining. And although this is largely the product of poorly costed tax cuts by Republican Presidents, Democrat Presidents have also declined to raise them back. **As a result of all this, federal spending as a percentage of the economy has risen sharply since 2000, while tax revenues have fallen.**

- As things stand, the fiscal deficit will grow to unsustainable levels in the coming decades, particularly after 2035 when Social Security’s trust fund will be exhausted. Beyond the Republicans’ goals, future Democrats will also have to look for ways to fund an increase in social spending, while special interest groups representing American industries that compete with imports will lobby to keep the tariffs in place. So Trump’s tariffs on every other country in the world may simply be reduced to a smaller baseline, not cancelled entirely. 

- *But* in a best case scenario, Trump’s tariffs could become so unpopular by 2028 that the next Democratic presidential nominee can confidently run on a promise to remove them, and in that case they would end with his presidency. Still, the odds of them surviving as a policy are much higher than they should be.

1-randomonium

Even if a successor ended all the tariffs companies would keep the price the same. It's a reset to a new price. My best example is chicken wing prices during the pandemic. They were expensive. Prices drop and chicken wings are still hyper expensive at restaurants.

iamhefty

A presidential candidate can say "I'm going to lower the cost of living overnight! I'm going to slash prices on food, cars, clothing, you name it.by getting rid of these ridiculous Trump tariffs! You're going to have more money in your pocket, businesses are going to see the cost of importing goods and resources drop dramatically so they can offer cheaper goods to the American people!! Life is going to become more affordable for the average American person and I won't have to raise taxes ONE CENT!"

The crowd fucking roars and lines up to vote.

Keeping these tariffs (at least at their current rates) would be the biggest political blunder in history.

salmonguelph

Trumps foolish tariffs have changed trading to favor China and the rest of the world.  We are no longer a stable trading partner.  Since agreement can change on the whims of a 2 year old mentality, we no longer can be trusted.  The rest of the world will just start buying goods and from stable trading partners.  This will slowly kill American business which will not be able to compete with China and other nations, other nations cost donot go up.  They still have the resource to build the product and cheaper labor.  The only place the price goes up is to the American consumer.  Even products that are American made will rise in price, because American business is not going to sell at a lower price than the market will bear.

Lott4984

Isn't it possible that if the democrats win a large enough majority in the house that they can just stop Trump from unilaterally imposing tariffs? 

The power to enact tariffs is congressional, not executive as far as I understand it. The only reason this shit is even happening is because republicans in congress are allowing it.

Basic_Butterscotch

lol, Biden increased Trump’s tariffs on China and kept most of his policies in place despite Trump undoing what Obama/Biden did. Whoever if ever there’s another President it will be status quo. These idiots think the US is the only economy worth a damn but as you can see all this mafia shakedown behavior is backfiring. India is laughing at those tariffs. China is rolling on the floor right now. Ok sure we have a big military(dwindling)and the dollar is still the reserve currency for now but you can’t go to war against the entire world either unless you want to destroy it all because you couldn’t see the forest for the trees?

HiramAbiff2020

Nay, the system can’t go this way any long. Income taxes need to be fairly distributed. Spending taxes (Sales tax, vat, tarrifs etc) will lead to crave the society even more, and will ultimately lead to the Guillotine returning en-voge

Fun_Performer_5170

The underlying idea's right - it's hard for the federal government to give up a source of revenue - but misses the degree to which the tariffs are regressive. 

There comes a point in any economy where crushing the poor and middle class to give a few more perks to the rich becomes unsustainable.

AdHopeful3801

Here is why they wont, competitive advantage. For all the failures of global trade and there's a multitude what you can not deny is the wealth creation via competitive advantages. Consequently most of trumps tariffs will be removed.

More likely what you'll see is an environment where US households save more relative to what they spend. This will drive higher investment into the US and by US households. And ultimately help get to a more balanced economy.

haveilostmymindor

 Because our government is in desperate need of funds.  Bad news is our deficit has never been larger, so even with tariff tax revenue, they can't stop spending even more

grasshopper239

If those tariffs come off does anyone seriously think the greedy oligarchs are going to suddenly drop prices?  No. They’ll just suck in more wealth through increased profits.

Bceverly

The article is fundamentally correct.  The US is teetering on a debt crisis.  We need the revenue and we don't have the stomach to raise income taxes on the majority of the population.  As a result, taxing the consumption of foreign made goods and services is basically all we have to raise a massive amount of money.  

Maybe you can push through a wealth tax or increase income tax on the top 1% but that only gets you so far and likely doesn't get you anywhere near the hundreds of billions that tariffs will raise.

IMO, this is going to be permanent.  I wouldn't be surprised if in the next few years other countries follow suit to try to control their debts.

I still can't believe that republicans were the ones to push through the biggest tax increase in history.

fish1900

The way inflation reporting works is on a year on year basis. Give it 12 months and hey presto inflation drops like a stone and he can start saying its not Biden s Economy but it's his

MCDCFC

forget about the successor 2 appeals courts already rejected the tarriffs saying that president doesnt have any control or power to put tariffs according to IEPA, which goes to supreme court and if they reject it and it woudl be back to normal by start of next year

Most-Excitement-1058

It’ll be a tool for whoever to remove so that they can say they’re gonna get the economy jumpstarted or whatever. The way current times feel i could see them saying “we’ve got the US manufacturing so much and the world is going crazy for our good that I’m getting rid of the tariffs so that all these countries that want America can have some” it doesn’t make sense but neither does half of what being said out there.

BeanieBopTop

Recent adjustments to tariff policies by President Trump aim to benefit consumers on certain imports, but provoke political backlash.

Trump's Tariff Policy Changes

Why This Matters

Public Sentiment Summary

Highlighted Comments

Parties Involved

What the people want