Public sentiment remains overwhelmingly negative towards the Gaza conflict, characterized by sorrow, anger, and despair over the humanitarian crisis affecting civilians, particularly children. There is a strong condemnation of violence from both Israeli and Hamas forces, alongside urgent calls for humanitarian aid and accountability. Many commenters express feelings of helplessness and frustration with international leaders' inaction, reflecting a collective plea for peace and justice.

Israeli Government

Hamas

International Leaders

United Nations

You're not necessarily wrong. But I feel like this presumes that attention and coverage are not finite resources.

Bodoblock

Well it’s an intentional manufactured media campaign- Hamas admits it in their charter and asks for the media to be a part of their cause. The major problem I have with it ? It’s just all a big lie. So they’re broadcasting lies 24/7. People believe in a concocted reality about the conflict and that’s dangerous. And that’s why I don’t think gaza coverage is positive. 

If I took a poll on Reddit , for example and asked - why do you think the October attacks happened ? 

99% would likely check off the box of : Because Israel stole land from the Palestinians and keep them in an open air prison and abuse them and  have forced them into an authritarian ethno state of colonial conquest. 

It’s actively misinforming the public. 

I’m all for coverage- but when it is a lie… or leaves out half a side? 

That’s not media coverage. 

That’s a weapon of war. 

That’s intentional manipulation. 

Lying on a scale and consequence of that level? 

That is evil.

Lopsided_Thing_9474

I've seen people write to you that there are many armed conflicts, or "problematic" situation around the world, and we can't spend attention around everything thus we need to prioritize.   


I'll give you another take on this -   
People siting in their homes in countries not in the conflict area usually know very little about the conflict itself, what are the beliefs of both sides and what are the way to solve the conflict. thus, often times - more attention and more reaction creates more harm than good.   


I can tell you that IMO, to a degree, the huge amount of attention and misinformed reaction over the Israeli Palestinian or Israel Arab conflict is done in a terrible way that only hinders peace between the sides. I can elaborate on that if you want to dig into this example, but it's not really the point.   


If you agree that misinformed reactions can cause harm, and there are a lot of things to react to - most of the reactions would be misinformed. Thus, it is not only about attention span and activist fatigue or political gains - it is also about creating less harm than don't. Of course it doesn't mean that nobody should ever pay attention or react to situations, this would be horrible, but IMO - over reaction could sometimes be worse than underreaction

comeon456

There *is* only so much time in a day. If the amount of coverage in Gaza shouldn't change, but other humanitarian crises need to be covered more...are you just gonna like add hours to the day?

Which humanitarian crises should be covered, and why?

How much time for each in a day, and why?

Bonus question: How do you control what tf news broadcasters choose to cover? They are a business. If no one gives af about a little Indian village that's been in shambles for decades, why are they going to send news anchors there and report back?

SnooPets1127

[deleted]

social media and big news companies will cover stories that will generate clicks thus creating an “overreaction”. Turns out that nobody really cares about the kurds and what’s been happening to them for generations so media doesn’t really cover that stuff.  I wouldn’t even be surprised if there were americans today who don’t even know the kurdish people exist. This is one example i’m giving btw there are many other groups who face just as terrible circumstances.


The real problem is ignorance. With the whole gaza thing, everybody on social media has something to say about it which is cool, great we’re talking about important things. You know what I noticed tho? the most radical people who are completely one sided in the conflict, are also the people who know least about the conflict. My theory is when people are too lazy to do like 30 minutes of research they just form a conclusion and will overreact to any piece of information. I tested this out by randomly interacting with someone i follow on ig who kept posting really weird stuff about the conflict and that person could not name a single historic thing that happened between israel/palestine, knew nothing about the wars with the arab league, nothing about death tolls, it was embarrassing.

Sauceoppa29

The attention Gaza is getting is driven primarily by anti-semitism and hatred of Jews.

the problem with this conflict is that with the high attention span given to this conflict comes an emotionalisation of the conflict. People look less for pragmatic answers but much more for idealistic answers. And these are often not the best answers. I would agree with you, if the added time investment of people would generate better discussions a d problem solving approaches. But that’s simply not the case. 

I really think that it is important to be educated about conflicts otherwise people create pressure/ expectations that are negatively going to impact the situation in a conflict region. What we see in this conflict is that both sides abuse the heightened amount of attention for propaganda. IMO, the actual amount of attention given to this by people that have no connection and no education about the conflict is detrimental. 

I believe that I am (somewhat) educated about this one, I extensively travelled all of the area, have friends in all of the region and read really really a lot about it. Most of the things that emerge from “involvement” of people is hatred, anti-islamism, anti-semitism, anti-capitalism. While such a complex situation requires a non emotional multi-faceted response.

Mcwedlav

Yes and no - we arguably focus too much on big events - especially when the cameras and press are already there because of the politics of it but even when they are not.

Roughly 150,000 people die every day of which 100,000 die of age related conditions. That means that 50,000 people a day die prematurely 

That is made up of a lot of small causes, lots of different ongoing humanitarian crisis going on across the globe all the time

Malnutrition kills. Poverty kills. The world price shock from the Russian invasion of Ukraine will probably kill more people than either it or any current war will do directly.

But the scale of it tends to overwhelm us. So we focus on much smaller but more discrete and visible disasters because we sort of think we can understand them.

SnooOpinions8790

I would broadly say that people saying Gaza gets too much attention aren't complaining about the attention it is getting.  They are asking (sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly) *why* Gaza is getting more attention.

It doesn't make sense to say it is the scale of death.  If that was true, you would expect conflicts like the Congo to get a lot more attention (6 million deaths since the 90s).

It seems unlikely it is sympathy for Muslims in particular - there are genocides committed both by and against other Muslims populations that generate little attention.

So what does make it unique?  *Why* do people care about it and not other conflicts?

Lorata

So when I call it an overreaction, I'm not saying don't care.

The overreaction is when like San Francisco voted 8-3 for a ceasefire or how pro-Hamas protestors stopped their parade outside a cancer center to scream and shout and disturb the cancer patients.  They're just mad and bored and have no outlet.

An appropriate reaction would be something constructive.  This is like when your overbearing wife grates and nags and yells and nags so much that you eventually snap and slam your car into the Accura that's tail gating you.

The closest they came to constructive was when they violently stormed the capitol a couple of months ago.

Gaza is easy to care about online. You are telling a developed democracy spending hundreds of millions on missile interceptors to stop defending itself proactively and go back to passively waiting until Hamas manages to breach them  again. There is an obvious status quo to propose returning to (in their eyes, I personally think Israel shouldn't have to accept constant rockets and the occasional terrorist incursion). Siding with Gaza is a clear underdog which is a win for internet activists too.

Stuff like tribal conflict in Africa, shit going in Ethiopia, Ugyhur persecution in China etc are more complicated so less of an easy internet talking point. As with anything its a matter of ease and controversy.

Selective outrage is always suspicious. And I do question the intentions of people who are selectively outraged about Gaza after being asleep at the wheel for other conflicts with much higher death tolls.

As for whether or not we are underreacting to other humanitarian crises, I have mixed feelings about it. War is always tragic and sad, but pacifism and appeasement have consequences that may lead to even higher levels of death. The challenge is figuring out which wars are justified and which wars are not. Sometimes it is easy to make that distinction and other times it is more complicated.

Bored_at_Work27

Yeah no shit. I am Venezuelan. There are almost 7 million Venezuelan refugees almost as much as Syria’s numbers and

There’s no war happening in Venezuela. 

We are a mere 2hours by plane from Miami so we are REALLY close to the USA. 

Yet our crisis is pretty much invisible.

maq0r

Each “crisis” gets the attention the media “thinks” it deserves.

What you do, individually about it, is up to you.

If you are in the US you have the right and freedom to do whatever your means let you.

YOU do NOT have the right or freedom to FORCE other people to care about YOUR personal priorities.

I would say the biggest issue or crisis outside of our own country is the Russia - Ukraine war now, that affects Europe the most and hence the stability of the FREE world.

I’ll start to care about Gaza and any Muslim nations once they come into the 20th century, and by that I mean give up their theocracies and fueling warlord despots, stop treating women like property, and stop killing gay members of society.
And actually contribute to world stability instead of the opposite.

Gaza gets far too much coverage.
The middle eastern nations are rich enough now (the wealth they hold is staggering, even if the wealth disparity within countries is completely staggering ) to band together and solve this problem, if they wanted to.  They don’t, though.

Instead most of the countries their are simply being used as a pawn in the Russia/China/Iran Vs US/EU/Israel charade that’s been going for decades.

So no, the coverage is completely over the top for this because it’s all political.

And I have enough issue working to pay my damn bills to GAF about global politics.

johnny2fives

Why do you think most people outside the Middle East should care about the crisis in Gaza? It doesn't affect their lives in anyway. It's strategically unimportant. Caring about a crisis doesn't stop the crisis from happening.

I think that Israel generally gets much more coverage that it should, but I want to focus more on the second part of your view that the world is 'under reacting to other humanitarian crisis'

People want to make a difference. Many of the other world crisis are in countries that don't care much about world opinion.  Israel cares about world opinion much more, and therefore may be more susceptible to be influenced by coverage of the conflict worldwide.

Cultural_Energy_2905

To a lot of people, the situation is much less complicated than other crises. The US gives Israel tens of billions of dollars worth of money and weaponry, and they've been accused of apartheid by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International and are currently defending an accusation of genocide at the International Criminal Court. 

"Stop giving them money" is a very simple ask, and it's one that can't be made in other humanitarian crises. We can't threaten to defund an earthquake. There's also a simple rebuttal to requests to condemn Hamas: we don't fund or support them ([Netanyahu, on the other hand, did](https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/)), so sure, stop sending US tax dollars to BOTH sides.

It's also emotionally charged in ways that other conflicts aren't, and there's a strong generational divide between parents who get their news from traditional media and their children who see [what IDF soldiers are putting on TikTok](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEih34n0C9Y). This is particularly prevalent in diaspora Jews, and I personally know people who aren't speaking to family members right now over the situation.

maxwellmaxwell

This may be a shitty take, but if you care about being a happy person... just ignore everything that doesn't directly impact you or your loved ones in your local area. 100 years ago we didn't know what was going on half way across the world. Ignorance is bliss. The only people you're helping by consuming the news is their advertisers sell more Viagra. Local news is the only thing that really matters and even then, there's only so much time in a day. Talking about something happening 10,000 miles away on social media just helps the advertisers sell more useless garbage. If you actually want to help, either donate some money to an organization or shut the fuck up. Think about all of the things you've bitched about over the last 10 years, has it helped anybody? Has it helped yourself? No?

People also act like world saviors when the sad Truth about this world is that there are wrongs we cannot right. Unless it's a really fucked up situation (I'm watching you, Adolf) you cannot help others while being crippled. I know this will sound cruel, but I worry for my own country before any other country. Yeah, mine won't be a war thorn hell hole, but still, we should keep our home clean before trying to clean other one's. And really be careful who you support, in my case, the only support I have is for civilian lives. But people are supporting factions that are dictatorships.

Spring063

I feel this pretty accurate. Not a peep while the Rohingya are being blown up for returning to their homeland in Myanmar. Not peep when Turkey has been systemically cleansing the Northern Iraq area from Kurds. Not a peep when we still have a problem with Boko Haram raping and kidnapping young women from Nigeria. The country cares more because it has to with Israel.

If Israel did what Myanmar does to the Rohingya, what Boko Haram does, or what Turkey does to the Kurds it would be more prominent but it has nothing to do with Israel so not a peep for those people.

The0Walrus

People, both individually and collectively, have limited attentional resources and can process a limited cognitive load. The public discourse can only focus on so much at any given time.

Overloading attention on global humanitarian crises for which the majority of people aren't directly affected and can't do anything about is a fruitless distraction from other things more worthy of their attention. It would suck up the focus from more proximate and more directly important issues closer to home. It may potentially allow domestic politicians to get away with more, with less accountability, both because the public isn't paying close attention and because it invites comparison with the worst humanitarian crises the world has to offer, so maybe they aren't so bad.

Going further, I think excessive attention and emotional investment in tragedies that are out of your control and have limited impact on you is mentally unhealthy. For many people, I would classify the Israel-Gaza conflict in this category (with obvious exceptions like if you're Israeli or Palestinian or live in the region or have family/friends who do etc).

Human beings evolved to be caring and compassionate because those were useful emotions when applied to the people around you, people with whom you were closely interconnected with. It helps build relationships, cooperation, and cohesion. Human beings weren't designed to care deeply about catastrophes happening thousands of miles away. If you can't do anything about it, and there's no impact on you which you need to keep in mind to adjust how you act, then it's not useful. And for most of human history, they couldn't expend emotional energy on faraway catastrophes. But now with modern technology, you can watch a HD livestream of children being murdered and it fools your senses so you put your attention towards it and you feel it as viscerally as if you were there in person, watching the slaughter of the people of your city or town or village except you're powerless to stop it. This is one of the core mechanisms by which social media erodes mental health.

Dangerous-Bid-6791

Not sure.

If we are speak about military conflicts:As far as I understood, Israel/Gaza conflict is rather unique. Israel is seen as "civilized" country, they ALSO seen as bad one and they mostly agree their actions could be seen as bad but it's necessary for their survival and they don't really want any diplomatic solutions. All other conflicts are between "uncivilized" ones or all sides say they are doing Good Thing or at least saying they are open to negatiations.

vikarti_anatra

Painting Jews as villains no matter what they do is the oldest propaganda move in history, it ain’t stopping any time soon.

KnowingDoubter

Let's take it as given that humanitarian crises are bad.

What are you trying to actually achieve by putting the attention of them uninformed masses on the situation? How does this actually help with the humanitarian crisis?

Imo, public attention only serves emotionalize the situation and make it harder for our diplomats and military to come up with a pragmatic solution.

zacker150

the killing of children in gaza is being broadcast in live time for everyone to see... ofco ppl are reacting to it right away 

OP is giving very whataboutism, complete erasure of human rights activists and humanitarian groups that have been sounding the alarm around the globe for decades, not just for gaza and everywhere else

Icy_Construction_821

The most annoying thing that my mom has to say about my this is that “oh well hamas started it with the killing of Jewish children” and I simply am aghast that her logic is to kill more children and viewing that as acceptable?!! Like I can’t debate when she doesn’t think about logic. 😡

Hot_Success8576

I believe the greatest humanitarian crisis right now is happening on home turf. We're all too focused on what other people are doing and not minding our own lives. I believe anyone at war is at war with themselves. World peace would be possible if people had inner peace.

honneylove

There are so many factors to consider in this, so I'm only going to speak in regards to protests and outrage. 

Firstly I'll point out the world's reactions to the Ukraine invasion and BLM, they were humongous and it felt like there was significantly less counter-discourse (i.e. pro Russian or anti-BLM). 

Now, the question of under reacting to other situations. You mentioned Sudan for example in another comment, I'll go with that for a moment. 

With the Sudan situation, it's been widely condemned by both the UN and many member states, sanctions have been imposed, war crimes investigations are underway, aid is being delivered, and some Western powers are intervening to deescalate. Not to mention Western powers are not (at least blatantly) funding what's happening, and there isn't a significantly cohort of people arguing that what is happening there is necessary, actually. 

Compare that with the Gaza situation. It's being directly funded and armed by many Western powers, Israel has not been widely condemned, sanctions have not been imposed, aid is being gatekept from entering Gaza, war crimes are not being investigated, and until recently nobody was really even thing to stop what's happening. 

Add on top of that the very significantly discourse to try and justify the aggression, misdirect from transgressions, and the strong West-facing propaganda campaign from Israel. Not to mention the brutal blockade that's resulted in the strangling of the livelihood of the people of Gaza, as well the fact they've been essentially living in a apartheid-like system for decades.

So, at least in my mind, there is significantly more reason to mobilize for Palestine than Sudan (and that applies to other conflicts too). Mostly to try and influence our Western governments to do something, anything, even matching what they are doing in Sudan. Obviously each situation is unique, but it's clear not enough is being done with regards to Gaza.

_Richter_Belmont_

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a whole got disproportionately more coverage than most others, let alone the current actual war in the Gaza Strip. It has many reasons for it, and most of them has nothing to do with the humanitarian crisis.

The religious aspect of it (Jew vs Muslim) rallies the religious people from both religions and parts of the Christian world as well. This is a huge population of the world (Muslim countries, and evangelical Christians, as well as Jewish communities around the world)

The “colonial” aspect of it (European Jews vs Arab MENA / white vs brown) brings a lot of attention from the rest of the formerly colonial occupied countries, and some colonial governments (SA for example)

It’s also a clash of the western cultures and ideas (equal rights, democracy and secularism) vs the eastern Arab culture (theocracy, tribalism, patriarchy) 

Let’s not forget its also a Cold War front (west vs USSR/russia), it used to be a British mandate state, the history Germany had to do with the creation of Israel and many others aspects, like good old antisemitism and the fact that Jews run the global media (see what I did there?)

What’s I’m trying to say is that, even without a humanitarian crisis, the area has a lot of foreign intervention and interest and therefore media coverage.

Mass media today mostly reports for two reasons (unfortunately): to have a lot viewers for ad revenue, and to shape the world view of their viewer. And inherently due to reasons I listed above this conflict brings a lot of viewers.

With zero disrespect to the tens of thousands of Somalis that died- no one cares about civil wars where both sides came from similar traditions, areas, colors and religions that decides to fight each other. It’s viewed as a local dispute not too different than a way for them to choose the next president- in the west it’s done via voting, in Africa via shooting the other side better. How much news coverage you get to elections in France for example? Pretty much the same as the Rohingya genocide, or the Syrian civil war. 

Should there be a dedicated channel to world disasters and humanitarian crises and you would have the screen split in 4 to be able to actually show all that is happening- the people will still won’t mind.

Last thing I would add, is that both Israeli and Palestinian are doing whatever they can to enlist people to their side even outside of traditional media - Israel is rich enough, and advanced enough to do it on their own, while the Palestinian side is getting help from the Muslim/arab world such as Qatar and Iran (also with their ties to China and Russia) which comes to show just how many hands are stirring the pot.

danziman123

Sadly Gaza may get more attention than the Ukraine currently but its the wrong form of attention. This conflict is not seen as the terrible event it is for both sides but rather as something you have to chose one site over the other. Reddit and Instagram are full of these shallow "Free Palestine" posts and people just repeating what some bored celebs have to say. The attention should be focused on help and support. Instead it just got integrated in our global cultural battle which is a tragedy on its own.

AmberJill28

Your post confuses me. Are you writing crisis as the plural of crisis? Or are you saying there is another single crisis that is being ignored. 

The plural of crisis is crises. At least in the USA.

You're reminding me of something a journalism prof. of mine liked to say. 'The biggest bias in news reporting isn't how the story is told, it's whether it's even told or not.'

Rabbitscooter

Saying Israel is at fault for HAMAS raping, kidnapping and murdering those people in October, btw is like saying rape victims are at fault for being attractive. If they weren't trying to attract people they wouldn't be raped.

The only "reactions" which are worth anything, are those that actually lead to positive change.

Getting angry with your friend because they slightly disagree with your views about a conflict on the other side of the world is not useful.

Allying with a hate group who literally want to murder your neighbors is not useful.

Someone in my town has been putting up signs telling people to boycott Jewish-owned businesses because Gaza. I think the person putting up those signs is *probably* a neo-Nazi, and is trying to stir up hatred against my Jewish neighbors. I do not think they are doing anything good for Palestinians.

----

Hamas is like ISIS or the Houthis. They are committed to murdering all the Jews, as a step on their psychotic path to creating a fascist state — which they believe to be an Islamic state. I'm not an Islamic theologian, so I don't have an opinion about whether their goals should count as "Islamic". From a secular political standpoint, their goals can be safely described as fascist: [a doctrinaire militarist dictatorship; illiberal, antisemitic, anti-modern; misogynistic, homophobic, and rapist; that centers around "heroic" death and war, and murders anyone who doesn't fit in.](https://interglacial.com/pub/text/Umberto_Eco_-_Eternal_Fascism.html)

Hamas' goals *do not* include protecting Palestinian civilians. If they did, they would consider following international law of war that is intended for protection of civilians, e.g. *not putting military installations in civilian hospitals and schools please.*

As a reminder, the reason that it's against international law to put military installations in civilian hospitals (or schools, or apartment buildings) is that doing so causes the civilian hospital to become a valid military target in wartime. Hamas doesn't give two fucks about Palestinian civilians, so they gleefully put military stuff in civilian places and blame the predictable results on Israel.

fubo

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/ethnic-killings-one-sudan-city-left-up-15000-dead-un-report-2024-01-19/?utm_source=reddit.com

solo-ran

The militant organizations like HAMAS will never seek to improve the way of life in GAZA. Instead of focusing on war and spending millions to wage war . Why should they ? The squalid depressing conditions are ideal breeding ground and an endless source of recruits for their cause.

Trebla_Nogara

The reason Gaza is getting attention is that America is directly supporting the occupying, brutalizing, and humiliating colonial forces directly causing the humanitarian crisis. A tax payer has to ask whether they like that idea, and if they don't, they need to voice their concerns to politicians and vote accordingly if they don't want to be part of what is going on.

There is a difference between America not deploying troops all over the entire world to play decider in all matters and not spending billions on fixing the problems faced by people in every part of the world like starvation and disease simply due to pragmatic reasons versus America spending billions to make weapons to send over directly to the occupying, colonial force that consistently uses brutality, destruction, and humiliation as tools to expand territory the same way Russia does in Ukraine. I've never heard of any urban warfare where 50% of every single building in the entire country was blown up with missiles and 70% of every home in the country has been blown to bits. The reason? I guess it just depends on what point in the disinformation campaign by Israel you want to accept as totally and completely true no matter what. Was it used to launch a missile? Were there *tunnels under everything so we blow up everything*? Was it because their new AI system recommended the target, minimizing the impact humans have here? "Oh, it's just what the computer told us to do. You understand now."

To make this distinction clear, America spent a lot of WWII not getting into the war. They were considering things and figuring stuff out. They were defending themselves instead of defending every single person on the planet. These are regular actions. However, if America were instead actively funding the Nazi regime, that would push things into a direction where it should be on the news all over the place since, by that point, clearly something has gone awry in the political system.

tedbradly

The problem isn't the attention it's getting. It's the amount of misinformation being spread.

What's wild to me is the amount of protest and marches in support of Palestine. But nearly zero countries are willing to take in Palestinian refugees. That says more about what countries think than anything.

Even I fell prey to misinformation early on. I thought the Palestinian people were just as much a victim of Hamas as Israel was. Turns out the Palestinian people were in lock step with Hamas from the start.

Nobody is offering answers to the Palestine issue, they are just screeching.

HorrorPerformance

Americans who care more about Gaza/Palestine than Maui are regarded

1. There's nothing you can really do to change the situation in Gaza. Protesting isn't going to work, and ceasefire now only leaves more possibilities of future war
2. Humanitarian crisis is caused by Hamas, who started the war and committed some of the most atrocious war crimes, and are using Palestinians as human shields. But nobody who protests about humanitarian crisis is protesting to oust Hamas.

3. No Muslim countries nearby are willing to accept Palestinians, and why not protest about that? It's because they don't want to accept them themselves.

4. People are sick and tired of hearing about the conflicts. People don't want some temporary bandaid solution only to keep hearing about war there again. Hamas never had a chance, so might as well let Israel take control over Gaza to open possibilities of increased stability in the region.

ZenDaFout

Icy-Iron-2117

Thanks Rude/Gulchan! Kind of feels like a game changer if middle east starts to burn. To be honest more concerning thoughts starting to circle in ones mind, but regarding to stock market, that means a complete rollover in portfolio. Gold and silver mining stocks stay, the rest I will sell on Monday. HUSA is the play! That chart and your comment tells a lot. Do you a have a proposal for defense stock as well?

AGforME

Man, you're something else. Thanks for sharing.

SprinklesDue2046

Jackape5599

Rude_Ad9567

BeKindToOthersOK

I was in TPET and sold high, now I'm in ENSV but this seems even more promising!

Mustache_ketchum

I don't think anything will come of this unless Israel retaliates. Futures are green, the doom look doesn't seem like it will happen

sergfro

Foreign-Ride6018

**Note from the mods**: During this time, many posts and comments are held for review before appearing on the site. This is intentional. Please allow your human mods some time to review before messaging us about your posts/comments not showing up.


*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Israel) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

But nobody cares about the humanitarian crisis in Sudan or Haiti it seems.

smexyrexytitan

Sure, let’s just keep blaming Israel for Hamas’s actions

FeargusVanDieman

Democrats need to win Michigan, I suppose....

Not to mention, if the Allies acted like that during WW2 with Germany, I have no doubt that we'd hail the swastika and speak German all over Europe. Geez...

Whydoikeepsuffering

Biden Admin can sit on a dreidel and spin

Ghazbag

Let’s put the shoe on the other foot for a minute, could you imagine the kind of media shrieking you would hear if the Biden administration threatened to do an arms embargo against Ukraine? Not saying that would be okay either, but the double standards are on full display, again.

StrikeEagle784

If Israel really is letting in all the aid, it should be fairly easy to document. 

If Hamas is stopping the aid from getting where it needs, Israel should be documenting that as well.

flossdaily

So all Hamas has learned is that if they target civilians and steal aid, then the Us and world will admonish Israel. Brilliant 🙄

[US statement that this is not true](https://x.com/Osint613/status/1846189831052800016).

Edit: US now confirms it *is* true. Tl;dr they made the threat privately, Israel leaked it, US is pissed.

clydewoodforest

Least surprising thing.  Bow down to the pro hamas vote in Michigan.  Literally 2 weeks after Iran sends missiles paid for the with billions biden unfroze. Funny they don't condition aid to gaza on the release of hostages.  Hamas is their democratically elected gov.  Let them provide for the people

Agitated-Quit-6148

The same US that showed Israel how easy it was by… building a dock to deliver humanitarian supplies but the dock was repeatedly attacked and then damaged in bad weather before being dismantled? That easy?

Israel needs to free itself from dependence on the US.   If that means developing *all* of their own weapons, then that's what they need to do.

JohnCharles-2024

The Iranian regime has successfully pulled the strings of their influence on western media, politics and academia and turned this conflict into Israel vs. the world.

This will only get worse if the regime is allowed to maintain power for the next decade... you can just imagine how much further support for Israel can and will slide if they are allowed to write the narratives in the west unopposed. All of these agents of influence take orders from Tehran. 

You know what you need to do.

Khshayarshah

Who in the U.S government thought this was a good idea? 🤦🏻‍♀️

yafufa

Sometimes it feels like being allied with the US and being controlled by the US is the same thing

themightycatp00

The cynic in me notices that the US's deadlines extend until after their presidential election in 3 weeks.  This appears to be a lot of political posturing.  

While on one hand, the United States is threatening to stop shipments of air defense missiles but on the other hand it's sending troops along with the latest American THAAD missile defense system (and the missiles to get along with it) ...  

The democrats internal polling must be really bad to play both sides of the conflict.

meh1234

Sadly I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that it's an election year and the race appears to be strangely close. Dems need every vote they can get even if it goes against their morals. Honestly if I were Bibi I would just ignore the US until after the election while securing another supplier.

As a US citizen, we are being dumb and unreliable allies.

aqualad33

Admirable-Rabbit8112

They've been whining about the impending doom for over a year now.

I can go on twitter and look at retweeted posts from Gaza by Gazans from today showing open good stands and well nourished people.

Who are they kidding?

ChallahTornado

I miss the time when the US was a true friend of Israel and didn’t give in to woke pressure. Sad what the current administration has become

Joaolasanha

Can someone help me understand what exactly is happening to the aid? I'm just an objective observer who saw the news article and thought, hey, I wonder what's actually going on here? I'm a data analyst by trade so I'm literally just interested in factual information. 'Israel is blocking the aid' 'Hamas is stealing the aid' obviously doesn't work. Obviously if the data/evidence doesn't exist then fair enough......cheers!

I'll get downvoted, but I'm not against this. A serious humanitarian crisis in Gaza will strengthen the genocide case and turn international support even further against us. We can't just turn ourselves into a total pariah state because Hamas are stealing aid. If Hamas steal it fine, it's out of our hands.

So infuriating the way Israel is held to (&amp; punished for) standards no other country in the world is 

Jellybeansss681

US State Dept briefing. First question.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCsz-NQsXvk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCsz-NQsXvk)

thirteenfivenm

I hope this is a publicly condemn, privately support thing.

lookamazed

No cares about Ukraine either. The UN has been in Gaza for 50 years and is entrenched with Hamasso how about having them release hostages?  And the food that they are holding in storage.

Happy_Economics9480

#THIS ARTICLE IS MISLEADING!!!

There is NO threat of an arms embargo. If you read the article, it says that the State Dept sent a strongly worded letter reminding Israel of its requirements to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza, and threatening an *audit* of the aid currently being sent. The letter concluded with a vague assertion that “Israel had 30 days to rectify the situation [re: humanitarian aid entering Gaza] and that failure to do so would lead to consequences for Israeli aid, as per American law.” The letter did NOT mention the word embargo, and it did NOT suggest any specific munitions or weapons systems that would be considered for withholding.

Bokbok95

Out of baklava? Go to the nearest Hamas warehouse if you need food.

  
FFS, this war could end in a month if we cut supply and put a siege on them just like any other country would (and did in history).

KingMob9

Well THAAD just arrived and American troops are about arrive as well, I’m not really sure what this is about. Times of Israel hasn’t reported it.

HappyGirlEmma

The United States sure cares alot about the wellbeing of a population where probably 90% detest it and what it stands for

ErikKir28

So Israel has 30 days to eliminate Hamas so that the aid being supplied to Gaza can reach its people.

Unlikely_Arugula190

BluePineapx2le

You know damned well aid organizations will be spiriting away Hamas combatants and taking hostages where they can be hidden elsewhere.

M_Solent

International law of war doesn’t require Israel to do more than it has. Hamas is constantly violating laws, however, by not distinguishing combatants from non combatants , keeping hostages, hiding in hospitals and schools , list goes on. It’s unfortunate the current state of things in the territory, but placing responsibility on Israel is unfounded.

AcrobaticScholar7421

I think Democrats will only understand their wrong doings when their daughters are forced to wear hijab and are R at gun point only and only than they will understand the need to fight tooth and nail against Islamic extremists but it will be too late at that point..look at the state of Canada and UK look at the crime rate, HAMAS represents the peak of that same extremists they are facing now soon they won't have to look at HAMAS to see it, only have to open their window

Lalala-land1882004

American jews will still vote democrat unfortunately

metsnfins

Israeli airstrikes in Gaza have led to significant civilian casualties amidst worsening humanitarian conditions, prompting international calls for a ceasefire.

Gaza Conflict and Humanitarian Crisis

Why This Matters

Public Sentiment Summary

Highlighted Comments

Parties Involved

What the people want