Supreme Court Aadhaar Ruling for Voter Identity in Bihar
The Supreme Court of India has directed the Election Commission to include Aadhaar as the 12th document for establishing voter identity during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar.
Why This Matters
This ruling directly impacts the electoral process and voter inclusion, making it highly relevant to the public as it affects citizens' ability to participate in democracy.
Public Sentiment Summary
Public sentiment is predominantly negative, marked by confusion and skepticism about the Supreme Court's decision to allow Aadhaar as a voter ID. Concerns about voter fraud, the potential for illegal immigrants to vote, and a lack of trust in the Election Commission are prevalent, overshadowing any perceived benefits of the ruling.
Highlighted Comments
Aadhar is not a proof of CITIZENSHIP. To get enrolled in India's VOTER LIST, one has to prove Indian CITIZENSHIP.
Even illegal immigrants with fake Aadhar Cards can vote. If Aadhar is not a proof for citizenship, inclusion of a person in the voter list on the basis of Aadhar looks rather awkward.
The SC is confusing!! AADHAR is not a proof of citizenship; only Indian citizens can vote.
Allowing Aadhar card is a farce. Hopefully this is just for this election and next onwards will be done better.
Parties Involved
- Supreme Court
- Election Commission
- Government of India
What the people want
Supreme Court: Ensure that voter ID guidelines strictly define proof of citizenship and seek clarity in our electoral processes.
Election Commission: Increase transparency and public trust by providing accessible and machine-readable voter lists.
Government of India: Address public concerns about electoral integrity and the potential for fraud with actionable reforms and safeguards.