Public sentiment regarding India's handling of relations with Pakistan at the UNGA is deeply polarized. On one hand, there is significant pride in assertive diplomatic responses reflecting nationalism, with supporters praising India's strong stances against Pakistan. Conversely, many criticisms target the Indian government's failure to navigate tensions effectively, alongside skepticism towards international bodies like the UN. This division highlights both a deep-rooted frustration with historical conflicts and a simultaneous sense of nationalism that supports strong action on terrorism.

Indian Government

Pakistani Government

United Nations

**Reminder:** Please be courteous to each other and report any violations of the subreddit rules.

 * Debate the point, not the person.
 * Be respectful and avoid personal attacks.
 * No hate speech.
 * Report rule-breaking content to the moderators.

 


*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/pakistan) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

It was advertised by the UN btw ,for only pakistan geographical youtube

Less-Lingonberry623

Something just feels off. Like, why was that Pro Israel lady Shama Junejo sitting behind Khwaja Asif in UN security council and then Khwaja Asif tweets that he was there in place of PM and don't know anything about her and points towards foreign office. Foreign office then tweets that she was not part of delegation and for her to attend the meeting approval of PM was required which was not given.

FrequentPair5591

I was thinking the same , how much amount of money they have to spend on 27minute long ad?

No-Passion-3849

Pretty much. Same thing they do by taking out massive ads in newspapers for some minor project

Mindless_Initial_285

It looks like the US and Israel are actively promoting the corrupt regime to try and get the Pakistani people's support. I suspect the recognition of Israel is coming very very soon. These criminals have sold out the Palestinians.

Darksky121

He needs to goto moosajee and get a decent dark suit made .

ProfAsmani

It appeared on my yt too, i was hella confused and literally thought koi insaan itna kaise gir skta h😭

whatever_913

I don't get it why are we still not over this BS yet. That small conflict of 1 week wasn't even that big of a deal that these people are making it that they took it to the UN. So many other nations talked about the biggest problem in the world right now and that is the genocide and these idiots just can't get over themselves

BigChungusParadox



🔗 **Bypass paywalls**:

* [www.reddit.com](https://archive.is/submit/?submitid=&amp;url=https://www.reddit.com/r/GeopoliticsIndia/comments/1nqvpvu/likely_india_will_soon_be_subjected_to_another/)

 

**📜 Community Reminder**: Let’s keep our discussions civil, respectful, and on-topic. Abide by the subreddit rules. Rule-violating comments will be removed.

❓ Questions or concerns? [Contact our moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/GeopoliticsIndia).

GeoIndModBot

I seriously doubt your hypothesis. Missiles going in on the airbase is one thing, but we sent in missiles straight into terrorist’s homes. Won’t dare to do it again. 

geodude84

This time, the attack will likely come from either Nepal or Bangladesh, and it'll hit a major city because Pakistan is assuming that it has American blessing. But at the same time, I am sure that there'll be very little pressure on India given Trump has already used up all his goodwill and leverage on the trade issue and Saudi Arabia never had enough leverage to deter India, what would be a scarier possibility would be China heating up the border instead.

nergal007

It will be a huge blunder from Pak if it happens soon. They have already let their 'Trump' card exposed and I don't think that India will feel any major 'Trump' effect this time. Muneer will have to look for more viable option to play in the backdrop of the skirmish. Recently India has sent a message to US that they would reduce the import of Russia Oil only if sanctions are lifted from Venezuelan and Iranian Oil (Source - Global Eye News on X). So, it won't be easy for Pak to get Trump along in it anytime soon.

Playful_Umpire_8066

2017-19? Like a decade before that we had much crazier designs. Gear knobs, slider, flip, slide qwerty, music keys, twist. Nokia, Sony Ericsson etc. were pumping out truly quirky funny designs. Now it's all blocks.

pr1m347

Slightly off topic but I'm questioning what Suadi is gaining by partnering with Pak? Could it be that they want another nuclear state by their side as USA slips down the list of dependable friends?

SabAccountBanKarDiye

Completely agree with your opinion 
But I feel this time the stakes are too high for Pakistan and it's adversaries

Outrageous_Gas6684

Because now he is busy dealing with America. The biggest negotiating point of pakistan is not that they will go nuclear. It is that they will turn into Iran. 
While dealing with Saudi and America is on, pakistan is not in a corner. He has to play ball.

He can not send his agents across the border while dealing with other countries.

He equated pakistan to a dump truck, and now that truck is carrying valuable payload. He can not risk jeopardising that for the sake of irritating india. 
There is no upside for the next attack.

Equivalent-Fee-5897

I agree with everything you wrote. But,  
  
Did you expect the destruction of terrorist airbases at no cost at all without SEAD ? And if so, do you genuinely believe they would not have evacuated said terrorist sites with the assistance of pakistan military within minutes ?

Rare_Turnover_420

Wait you think India caved under pressure for a ceasefire? I thought it was Pakistan that reached out to India for a ceasefire? There was also widely reported tension between India and the US because the Indian government rejected Trump's suggestion that he pressured them into a ceasefire. Do you feel the Indian government was lying about this and that it got pressured into a ceasefire with Pakistan?

G20DoesPlenty

Right now I think Pakistan will focus more on bringing in other countries into their defence setup, especially strengthening ties with Saudi Arabia and maybe even USA. That will give them more backing and confidence for such moves.

LibranduMan

US knows how to use pak army and saudi money against India better than anyone else in the world

Pure_Garlic_7454

I agree with your point but I don't think we didn't cause enough of a strategic deterrent. From Uri to Balakot and recently Pahalgam we have been raising the bar with our responses... And the amount of damage our missiles did in Op Sindoor was just too much. The sat pics literally reveal how insane it was for them alone. 

So yeah I do agree that pak will do what it does again and India can be diplomatically isolated but again we have China under who Pak pays it's allegiance too and china doesn't want the conflict so let's see

SeventyCents

#DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE OP LINKED THREAD/SCREENSHOT.
 
Brigading is against Reddit TOS. So all users are advised not to participate in the above linked original thread or the screenshot. We advise against such behaviour nor we are responsible if your account is being actioned upon.

Please do report this post if the OP has not censored/redacted the subreddit name or the reddit user name in this post, so that we can remove the post and issue the ban as per rules.


*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*

No Mathew or Malhotra is doing jihad here. If it really hurts their pride, they should stop the cope and deal with the terrorists in their country.

SuspiciousGuitar3269

Let there be religion based reservation on terrorist listing based on population of each religion 🤡

AttitudsEvrythng_153

But they use to say that terrorism has no religion.

sojabhaibolly

I think a day might come that religions might lose the overprotective status they have gotten. Or some laws around religion might make certain religions difficult to thrive

anotherthroaway01

Where is Diversity and Inclusion damn it!!
/s

Kurious-0

I request Rahul Gandhi to please ask the UN to have a reservation there, Indian backward classes are not getting opportunities.

General_6252

GlitteringNinja5

This is going to be shocking but have you tried not doing any terrorism?

GovindChad

Each day is an opportunity for them to show how shameless they are.

satyanaraynan

We need quota in terrorist list. Call raga.

Abject-Internal9077

Because someone told them that they'll be getting 72 virgins, if their name comes up on that list.

_cosmicdust__

Terrorism don't have a religion , Yeah sure buddy

[deleted]

Meanwhile Rahul Gandhi thinking to introduce reservations there too

Glittering-Pen-9502

[https://youtube.com/watch?v=-h9Kop1oglM?t=38s](https://youtube.com/watch?v=-h9Kop1oglM?t=38s)

Commercial-Height935

They needed 100% reservation and they got it.

Different-Side5335

Short_Ad_3943

dumbledork99

While terrorists often cite religion, including distorted readings of Islamic texts, the vast majority of Muslims reject such interpretations as un-Islamic

WitherSoul123

wasnt a certain someone in most wanted list  but is now a great frand of uS  and leader of syria?

kacy757

Yeah not like un terroist watchlist is tied to imperial designs and ambitions empower by the collective west. Surely not. Hindutva and Zionist parties would be at the forefront of watchlists if things actually worked democratically

Novel-Rise2522

Someone should ask him - "So, you tell me - WHY?"

Always_Duh

Less-Dingo111

If Pakistan gets a conscience and the ability of self-reflection, all of the problems would go away in an instant.This position in UN is par for the coursw for them.

papa_kilo_sierra

We need DIE in terrorist list! This is outrageous!

srdshukla4

Terrorist organisations need to be more inclusive and hire from different ethnicity and religious identity. /s

General_Yt

Why is that UN don’t know that they are peaceful ppl?

Southern_lonlyWolf

BluejayDue7245

An-Shoe-Man

wait this can't be real, then again it's the same govt. who's sources are social media

Drakaus_Abyss_King

AwarenessNo4986

Meanwhile, various groups from India are asking for their community quota in the list.

Unholy_Ren

The list should be inclusive. There should be quota for all religions. Shameful practice by the UN.

Fancy-Zucchini-3149

Truth is always unacceptable for a liar like Pakistan 

Murky-Baby-7573

UN is lap dog of WEST (US/UK/France). That's it.  UN is a (as planned) failed organization which can't stop wars or genocide, etc. for which it was created.

Glad_Beginning_1537

I think the issue here is all terror attacks done by other groups are not seen as "terrorist" attack. How many school shootings take place in America? They literally have racist groups that do fked up shit because they think they're superior. None of them get labelled a terrorist. 

America has the highest number of serial killers, the most gangs, the most school shootings, the most fanatic groups, the most SA cases, some of which are done for political power. But they don't call them terrorists, they're acts done by mentally disturbed people or loners according to them. But as soon as they find out it was done by a Muslim? TERRORIST!! 

The issue isn't that we're saying don't label Muslims as terrorist, those who do terrorist acts should be labelled as such, but that should be regardless of the religion.

Aggressive_Ad_9968

Little-Web-7544

The whole israel name should also be there but you guys are the most sick and biased Mfd so you wouldn't get it.

Ok_Note7045

It is factually incorrect that all names are muslims but keep coping rw brainrot

electr0de07

I'm not supporting Pakistan when I say this but there are actually non-muslim terrorists around the world that need more attention. 

These terrorists exist in lawless countries like parts of Africa for example, where military rule reigns over the people. Some other examples are communist nations with compromised governments like Columbia and other parts of South America during Pablo Escobar's reign. Even today, Mexico has gangs which act very similar to terrorist organisations. 

The big question here is, why do these other legitimate terror groups don't get the global recognition they deserve. My guess is that western countries, especially USA, benefit from these more local than global terror organisations or the CIA might even have a hand in running them behind the scene, is the reason UN does not recognise or talk about them on global forums. 

Though it doesn't change the fact that the many Muslim terror groups are still a bigger threat to many nations and still deserve a bigger spotlight than the other examples I talked about.

centaurus_a11

The UN is kind of a fucked up body of a colonial past with the way the UNSC permanent members and their veto works isn't it?

The majority of countries have wanted and recognized a 2 state solution since forever but it doesn't feel that way because the UN is actually comprised of only 6 countries in practicality.

fcuk_the_king

India has supported a two state solution. Even throughout this conflict it has supported a two state solution

Schwifty234

gantamk

powerflower_khi

https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/09/1165835

DioTheSuperiorWaifu

Just another resolution, just another day, and the business as usual.

Uncertn_Laaife

It won't matter coz neither Israel nor Palestine want a 2 state solution.

Seahorse_Delhi

we should do the same for suwayda and kurdistan

BimaruSlayer

So the RSS will continue arming Israel, while pretending to side with human rights. Murderous Hitler worshipping goons.  

Naive_Technician_212

India and Pakistan exchanged accusations of terrorism during the UN General Assembly, emphasizing international relations and security.

India-Pakistan Relations and Global Terrorism at UNGA

Why This Matters

Public Sentiment Summary

Highlighted Comments

Parties Involved

What the people want