Delhi High Court Rulings on Money Laundering
The Delhi High Court has issued important rulings regarding the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), reinforcing the powers of the Enforcement Directorate to act against illegal activities.
Why This Matters
This topic engages the public by addressing financial crimes, legal enforcement, and the implications for accountability in governance.
Public Sentiment Summary
Public sentiment towards the recent Delhi High Court rulings on money laundering is extremely negative, driven by a strong perception of corruption within the judiciary and skepticism about its ability to enact meaningful change. Many users express frustration, believing that systemic issues will persist despite these rulings.
Highlighted Comments
All judges are corrupt, including most in supreme court. The higher the judge post, the higher the amount of corrupt money stashed in cash or Swiss accounts.
Judges are the most corrupt vile creatures with God complex. Give them money and they will be on their knees.
Until people go to the streets, nothing will happen. Judiciary is the biggest scam where nepotism thrives.
The judiciary is supposed to be the last line of defense for democracy. If corruption reaches there, it raises a terrifying question — who will hold the protectors accountable?
You read it right. Our entire system, be it Government, Judiciary, Administration etc. needs a complete over-haul.
Parties Involved
- Delhi High Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Indian Government
What the people want
Delhi High Court: Reinstate public trust by demonstrating integrity and accountability in your rulings.
Supreme Court of India: Actively work towards restoring faith in the judiciary by tackling corruption head-on.
Indian Government: Implement systemic reforms to address the issues plaguing the judicial system and ensure justice is served.