Judicial Appointments in India

The Supreme Court of India is discussing the criteria for promotions within the district judiciary, focusing on issues of seniority and judicial efficiency.

Why This Matters

Judicial reforms are critical to public trust in the legal system, and discussions on fair practices can lead to considerable public engagement.

Public Sentiment Summary

Public sentiment towards the judicial appointment process in India is largely negative, characterized by frustration over the collegium system and perceived nepotism and corruption within the judiciary. While there are calls for reform and accountability in judicial appointments, many commenters express deep skepticism about the integrity of the legal system, leading to a prevalent feeling of hopelessness regarding justice.

Highlighted Comments

As a student of law I am not in the favour of collegium system. This system is completely taken over by certain families and their enjoying all perks and privileges.

Indian judicial system is fully corrupted need civil service exam and major reforms

Judiciary has become a big joke in India, most of the judges get appointed by previous judges and this system should be abolished.

Even judges are subjected to outside pressures, which compromises their independence.

Dark days ahead for Indian Judiciary.

Parties Involved

  • Indian Judiciary
  • Government
  • Legal Professionals

What the people want

Indian Judiciary: Urgently address the issues of corruption and nepotism to restore public trust.

Government: Implement significant reforms to ensure transparency and accountability in judicial appointments.

Legal Professionals: Advocate for systemic changes that protect the integrity of the legal system.